(PS) Smith v. C.D.C. D.V.I. RC S.P., No. 2:2010cv02918 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/20/11 ADOPTING 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full and DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Smith v. C.D.C. D.V.I. RC S.P. Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH A. SMITH, 11 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-2918 GEB DAD PS Defendants. ORDER 12 13 v. C.D.C., et al., 14 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 18 On June 24, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 20 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the 21 findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 24, 2011 (Doc. No. 4) are 3 4 5 adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: July 20, 2011 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.