Flores v. Cate et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/08/11 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RAYMOND FLORES,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-10-2832 DAD P
M. CATE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
ORDER
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On
November 1, 2010, plaintiff’s consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge was filed.
18
By order filed April 28, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
19
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired and
20
plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without
22
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
23
DATED: June 8, 2011.
24
25
26
DAD:4
flor2832.dismiss
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
