(SS) Lindgren v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2010cv02818 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/15/11 ORDERING this case REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Sentence Four and final judgment shall be entered in favor of pltf and against dft reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(SS) Lindgren v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 16 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 3 Social Security Administration GERALYN A. GULSETH, CA SBN 160872 4 Special Assistant United States Attorney 1 5 6 7 8 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8923 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Geralyn.Gulseth@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MARLA MILLARD LINDGREN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________) CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-2818-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their 21 respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social 22 Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social 23 Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. 24 On remand, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will further evaluate Plaintiff’s 25 residual functional capacity with additional consideration of the medical source opinion 26 evidence. The ALJ will also obtain vocational input, and give further consideration to 27 steps four and five of the sequential evaluation process. The Appeals Council and/or 28 ALJ may take any additional action deemed warranted to issue a new decision. Dockets.Justia.com 1 The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final 2 judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, 3 reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. 4 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 7 Dated: April 10, 2011 /s/ Andrew T. Koenig (As authorized via e-mail) Andrew T. Koenig Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: April 6, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 /s/ Geralyn A. Gulseth GERALYN A. GULSETH Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 16 Attorneys for Defendant 14 17 ORDER 18 19 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 24 DATED: April 15, 2011 ____________________________________ __ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.