(HC) Collins v. Salinas, No. 2:2010cv02766 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/4/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice; 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(HC) Collins v. Salinas Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD COLLINS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Petitioner, No. 2: 10-cv-2766 MCE KJN P Respondent. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS vs. S. SALINAS, / By order filed February 16, 2011, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within ten 17 days, for his failure to file a notice of change of address. Although the order to show cause was 18 returned unserved, petitioner was properly served. Because petitioner failed to file a notice of 19 change of address, this action should be dismissed. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 25 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 26 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 2 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 3 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: March 4, 2011 5 6 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 col2766.fr 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.