Gillaspy v. County of Sacramento

Filing 18

ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/14/11: Added attorney Jesse M. Rivera, Jonathan B. Paul and Shanan L. Hewitt for Defendants Paul Labane and Christopher Nelson. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 R I V E R A & A S S O C I AT E S 2 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 310 Sacramento, California 95815 3 Tel: 916-922-1200 Fax: 916 922-1303 4 Jesse M. Rivera, CSN 84259 Jonathan B. Paul, CSN 215884 Shanan L. Hewitt, CSN 200168 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Deputy Paul Labane, Deputy Christopher Nelson 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ALEXANDER GILLASPY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) vs. ) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; DOES 1 ) through 100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-CV-02753 LKK EFB SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 20 BY OUR SIGNATURES BELOW, it is hereby mutually agreed that JESSE M. RIVERA, 21 JONATHAN B. PAUL and SHANAN L. HEWITT, of the LAW OFFICES OF RIVERA & 22 ASSOCIATES, are substituted in on Case Number 2:10-CV-02753 LKK EFB, and Robert Chalfant, 23 of The Law Offices of Randolph, Cregger & Chalfant, is substituted out of said case, as attorney 24 of record for Defendants Deputy Paul Labane, and Deputy Christopher Nelson . 25 I hereby agree to said substitution. RIVERA & ASSOCIATES 26 DATED: November 11, 2011 /s/ Jesse M. Rivera 27 28 JESSE M. RIVERA 1 I hereby consent to said substitution. LAW OFFICES OF RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT 2 3 DATED: November 11, 2011 /s/ Robert L. Chalfant Robert L. Chalfant 4 5 DATED: November 11, 2011 /s/ Paul Labane Paul Labane 6 (As authorized on November 10, 2011) 7 8 DATED: November 11, 2011 /s/ Christopher Nelson Christopher Nelson 9 (As authorized on November 10, 2011) 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 13 Dated: November 14, 2011. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?