Mclaughlin et al v. County of El Dorado et al
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/18/11 ORDERING that the 12/5/11 hearing on the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment 36 and 44 is VACATED. Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to Modify the Scheduling Order 33 is DENIED as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DOWELL McLAUGHLIN,
et al.,
NO. CIV. S-10-2551 LKK/GGH
11
12
Plaintiffs,
v.
O R D E R
13
COUNTY OF EL DORADO,
et al.,
14
Defendants.
/
15
16
1.
Plaintiffs’ motions to amend the First Amended Complaint,
17
and for appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem (Dkt. No. 48), shall
18
remain on the December 5, 2011 calendar with its current briefing
19
schedule;
20
2.
The December 5, 2011 hearing on the cross-motions for
21
summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 36 & 44), which motions are based upon
22
the above-referenced First Amended Complaint, is VACATED;
23
a.
If the parties choose, they may renew their cross-
24
motions, or file replacement motions (including a renewed or
25
replacement motion for approval of the minors’ compromise), after
26
the court has ruled on the motions to amend and appoint a Guardian
1
1
Ad Litem (“GAL”).
2
b.
Such renewed or replacement motions, if any, shall
3
be filed no later than two weeks after the court has ruled on the
4
motions to amend and for appointment of a GAL;
5
6
3.
Plaintiffs’ “ex parte” application (Dkt. No. 33) to
modify the scheduling order is denied as moot.1
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
DATED:
November 18, 2011.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1
25
26
Plaintiffs asserted that they needed additional time to get
a transcript for their summary judgment motion. They now have the
time available to get the transcript for use in their renewed or
replacement summary judgment motion.
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
