Whitney v. Miranda et al
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/20/2011 GRANTING 23 Defendants' request to conduct plaintiff and witness' depositions via videoconference is GRANTED; Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Reader, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
(916) 456-1122
(916) 737-1126 (fax)
Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021
LaKeysia R. Beene, CSB #265078
5
6
Attorneys for defendants
SWINGLE, NEPOMUCENO and MIRANDA
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
NORMAN WHITNEY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
R. MIRANDA, et al.,
Defendants.
14
Case No. 2:10-cv-02532-FCD-EFB
PROPOSED ORDER
15
ORDER
16
Defendants SWINGLE, NEPOMUCENO and MIRANDA seek an order from the
17
18
Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants’
19
counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff NORMAN WHITNEY and all witnesses in
20
this case via videoconference.
21
Having read defense counsel’s request,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
23
1.
Defendants’ request to conduct plaintiff and witness’ depositions via
24
videoconference is GRANTED.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
Whitney v. Miranda [2:10-cv-02532-FCD-EFB] Order
Page 1
1
2.
Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution
2
to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
3
Dated: June 20, 2011.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Whitney v. Miranda [2:10-cv-02532-FCD-EFB] Order
Page 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
