Anderson v Tate
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/17/2011 ORDERING that plaintiff's 35 and 38 motions are VACATED and will be DISREGARDED. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAMUEL ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,
10
No. CIV S-10-2487 JAM GGH P
vs.
11
12
MATTHEW TATE, et al.,
13
Defendants.
ORDER
/
14
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to appoint counsel
15
16
and for law library access. However, this action was dismissed and closed on May 10, 2011.1
17
Therefore, plaintiff’s motions are vacated and will be disregarded.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions (Docs. 35, 38)
18
19
are vacated and will be disregarded.
20
DATED: November 17, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
GGH: AB
23
ande2487.ord3
24
25
26
1
While plaintiff filed an appeal, the Ninth Circuit denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in
forma pauperis on September 15, 2011, and stated the appeal would be automatically denied if
plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in 21 days. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee.
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
