Johnson v. Sanwal et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/24/2011 DISCHARGING its 13 Order to Show Cause. (Marciel, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SCOTT N. JOHNSON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. CIV S-10-2481 JAM DAD
vs.
MOHINDER K. SANWAL, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff has been ordered to show cause in writing why $150 in sanctions should
16
not be imposed for his failure to appear on June 17, 2011 for the hearing of a motion he noticed.
17
In response, plaintiff states that he forgot the hearing although it was on his calendar. Plaintiff
18
previously failed to appear on February 11, 2011 for the hearing of a motion he noticed before
19
the undersigned in Johnson v. Karin Cocktails, Inc., Case No. CIV S-09-3337 MCE DAD.
20
Although sanctions will not be imposed in this instance, plaintiff is cautioned that any failure to
21
appear at the hearing of a motion he has noticed in the future is likely to result in the imposition
22
of monetary sanctions. The court’s order is show cause (Doc. No. 13) is discharged.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 24, 2011.
25
26
DAD:kw
Ddad1\orders.civil\johnson2481.osc.dsch
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
