(PC) Delgado v. CDCR Medical Health Care Department, et al, No. 2:2010cv02379 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/9/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 are ADOPTED in FULL; and defendants Cardeno, K. Daly, Duk, Liamcar, Dave Russell, Sahoto, Val, Verga, J. Ball and CDCR Medical Health Care Department are DISMISSED without prejudice from this action. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Delgado v. CDCR Medical Health Care Department, et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DELGADO, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-2379 MCE KJN P vs. CDCR MEDICAL HEALTH CARE DEPARTMENT, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 5, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 5, 2010, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants CDCR Medical Health Care Department, Daly, Verga, Val, Duk, 4 Liamcar, D. Russell, J. Ball, Sahuto and Cardeno are dismissed without prejudice from this 5 action. 6 Dated: December 9, 2010 7 8 9 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
