-KJN (TEMP)(HC) Wright v. Dickinson, No. 2:2010cv02173 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/18/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-KJN (TEMP)(HC) Wright v. Dickinson Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK WRIGHT, 11 Petitioner, 12 No. CIV S-10-2173 JAM KJN (TEMP) P vs. 13 KATHLEEN DICKINSON, 14 Respondent. 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed June 10, 2011, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed and 17 thirty days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now 18 expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. 19 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 21 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 22 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 23 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 24 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 25 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 DATED: July 18, 2011 4 5 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 wrig2173.fta 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
