Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/13/11 ORDERING the time for responding to pltf's motion for summary judgment 21 is EXTENDED 45 days to 7/24/11. (Carlos, K)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
KATHRYN R. WATSON
Special Assistant United States Attorney
5
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8928
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Kathryn.Watson@ssa.gov
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
KEVIN G. WOODS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
CIVIL NO. 2:10-CV-02031 EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, and
20
21
with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion
22
for Summary Judgment be extended 45 days from June 9, 2011 to July 24, 2011. This is Defendant’s
23
first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s motion.
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
Defendant needs the additional time to further review the file and prepare a response in this matter.
2
Respectfully submitted,
3
4
5
Dated: June 9, 2011
/s/ Ann M. Cerney
(As authorized via phone)
ANN M. CERNEY
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: June 9, 2011
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
6
7
8
9
10
11
/s/ Kathryn R. Watson
KATHRYN R. WATSON
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: June 13, 2011.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
