Urbano v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/3/11, ORDERING that the Order to Show Cause 18 is DISCHARGED and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 20 is deemed timely filed. (Kastilahn, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
CARLOS URBANO,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. CIV S-10-2007 EFB
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
14
Defendant.
ORDER
/
15
The above-captioned action is proceeding before the undersigned pursuant to the consent
16
17
of the parties. E.D. Cal. L.R. 305; Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. On May 2, 2011, the undersigned issued
18
an order requiring plaintiff to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failure to timely
19
file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand, and directing plaintiff to file a motion for
20
summary judgment and/or remand on or before May 23, 2011. Dckt. No. 18.
On May 23, 2011, plaintiff’s counsel filed a response to the order to show cause,
21
22
acknowledging her failure and apologizing for her oversight. Dckt. No. 19. Also on May 23,
23
2011, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. Dckt. No. 20.
24
////
25
////
26
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the May 2, 2011 order to show cause,
2
Dckt. No. 18, is discharged and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, Dckt. No. 20, is
3
deemed timely filed.
4
SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: June 3, 2011.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
