-GGH (PS) Johnson v. Watson et al, No. 2:2010cv01968 - Document 58 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/15/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiffs 55 motion for clarification, filed February 9, 2011, is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff's opposition to the motions to set aside entry of default, filed Janu ary 18, 2011, shall be due within fourteen days of an order adopting or rejecting this court's findings and recommendations disposing of the trustee's motions to intervene and to dismiss. Any reply may be filed within seven days after an opposition is filed. No sur-reply is permitted.(Duong, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GGH (PS) Johnson v. Watson et al Doc. 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEPARD JOHNSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-1968 GEB GGH PS vs. CHESTER MITCHELL, et al., ORDER 14 15 16 17 Defendants. / Plaintiff, who proceeds in pro se, has filed a request for clarification of this court’s 18 order of February 8, 2011. The order in part vacated the hearing on defendants’ motions to set 19 aside entry of default, and provided that they would be taken under submission without oral 20 argument after all briefing was filed. Plaintiff is informed that the briefing schedule is 21 determined by E.D. Local Rule 230 which requires an opposition fourteen days preceding the 22 notice hearing date, and an optional reply seven days prior to the hearing date. The previously 23 noticed hearing date of March 3, 2011 is the operative date. 24 Plaintiff’s proposed briefing schedule is construed as a request for extension of 25 time to the aforementioned rule. As the pending motions to intervene and dismiss may render 26 such matters moot, that request is granted. Plaintiff’s opposition shall be due no later than 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 fourteen days after an order adopting or rejecting this court’s findings and recommendations 2 disposing of the trustee’s motions to intervene and to dismiss. For this reason, plaintiff can file 3 such opposition at any time up to the fourteen day limit set forth above taking into consideration 4 his own availability. 5 As to plaintiff’s questions regarding the timing of the issuance of an order, the 6 court’s determination on the pending motion to intervene and dismiss will be determined after all 7 briefing is submitted and as soon as practicable. 8 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 9 10 11 1. Plaintiff’s motion for clarification, filed February 9, 2011, (dkt. # 55), is granted in part. 2. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motions to set aside entry of default, filed January 18, 12 2011, shall be due within fourteen days of an order adopting or rejecting this court’s findings and 13 recommendations disposing of the trustee’s motions to intervene and to dismiss. Any reply may 14 be filed within seven days after an opposition is filed. No sur-reply is permitted. 15 DATED: February 15, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 16 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 GGH:076/Johnson1968.cla.wpd 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
