(PC) Madueno v. Stanton et al, No. 2:2010cv01850 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/30/10 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Orlando Madueno. Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. Case assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Madueno v. Stanton et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLANDO MADUENO, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1850 GGH P vs. GARY STANTON, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed August 3, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file an affidavit in 17 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee within 18 twenty-eight days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that 19 this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 20 responded to the court’s order and has not filed an affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 22 The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 26 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 2 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 3 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 4 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: September 30, 2010 6 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 /madu1850.fifp 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
