Terry v. Cate et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/03/11 ordering within 28 days of the date of this order, the state Attorney General or a designee shall, if known, file a Suggestion of Death identifying plaintiff's successor or represen tative. The Attorney General, or her designee, shall also, if practicable, also serve a copy of the Suggestion of Death on plaintiff's successor. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. As plaintiff is evidently deceased, the Clerk of the Court is directed not to serve a copy of this order upon him at the prison address, as the mail will simply be returned. (cc: Monica Anderson) (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 NICK TERRY, 10 11 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1842 GGH P vs. 12 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff was directed, by Order filed on October 14, 2011, to show cause why all 16 defendants should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) or, in the alternative, for 17 plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, in an action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, had paid his filing fee in full1 and had been directed to complete service of 19 process of his second amended complaint within sixty days in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, 20 but there was no evidence that the defendants had subsequently been served. 21 However, the show cause order was returned, indicating that plaintiff is deceased. 22 At this time, although it is not clear that any defendant was served,2 the court will direct the state 23 24 1 25 26 Plaintiff had been granted ample opportunity to file an in forma pauperis affidavit to determine whether he could qualify for in forma pauperis status, but ultimately indicated that he could not do so based on the amount of his financial resources, which left him responsible for service of process. See, e.g., Order, filed on October 14, 2011, n. 1. 2 Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and 1 1 Attorney General’s Office to file a notice of suggestion of death pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 25(a)(1). The suggestion of death, in order to be valid and to invoke the ninety day limit for 3 filing of a motion for substitution, should, if possible, identify the successor or representative 4 who may be substituted for decedent. Smith v. Planas,, 151 F.R.D. 547 (S.D. N.Y. 1993). 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. Within twenty-eight days of the date of this order, the state Attorney General, 7 or a designee, shall, if known, file a Suggestion of Death identifying plaintiff’s successor or 8 representative. The Attorney General, or her designee, shall also, if practicable, also serve a copy 9 of the Suggestion of Death on plaintiff’s successor; 10 11 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; and 12 3. As plaintiff is evidently deceased, the Clerk of the Court is directed not to serve 13 a copy of this order upon him at the prison address, as the mail will simply be returned. 14 DATED: November 3, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 GGH:009 16 terr1842.ord 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Rehabilitation, is among the named defendants but he is an official capacity defendant only. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?