Lum v. County of San Joaquin, et al.,
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/18/11 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 29 Motion to Compel. Defendants shall disclose to plaintiffs the employee training records of defendants Davis, Walters, Pease and Mendoza by close of b usiness on 11/21/11. The production will be pursuant to the stipulated protective order which the court is entering this date. On or before 12/5/11, counsel for defendants shall file with the court the declaration regarding the good-faith efforts tak en in responding to plaintiffs discovery requests discussed at the 11/18/11 hearing. Finally, on or before 12/5/11, counsel for defendants shall submit to the undersignedthe 10/1/09 letter from Sergeant Basalto to File, along with a statement regardi ng why defense counsel believes that the redacted portion of that document has been withheld as protected by the attorney-client privilege, for in-camera review. In all other respects plaintiffs motion to compel (Doc. No. 29) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Meuleman, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JERRY LUM, et al.,
11
12
13
Plaintiffs,
No. CIV S-10-1807 LKK DAD
v.
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN,
et al.,
ORDER
14
Defendants.
15
16
/
This matter came before the court on November 18, 2011, for hearing on
17
plaintiffs’ motion to compel further responses to plaintiffs’ Special Interrogatories (Set One) and
18
to compel further production of documents responsive to plaintiffs’ Request for Production of
19
Documents (Set One). Rana Ansari-Jaberi, Esq. and Peter J. Koenig, Esq. appeared for the
20
moving party. Dana Suntag, Esq. appeared for defendants.
21
For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiffs’ October 12, 2011 motion to
22
compel (Doc. No. 29) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants shall disclose to plaintiffs
23
the employee training records of defendants Davis, Walters, Pease and Mendoza by close of
24
business on November 21, 2011. The production will be pursuant to the stipulated protective
25
order which the court is entering this date. On or before December 5, 2011, counsel for
26
defendants shall file with the court the declaration regarding the good-faith efforts taken in
1
1
responding to plaintiff’s discovery requests discussed at the November 18, 2011 hearing.
2
Finally, on or before December 5, 2011, counsel for defendants shall submit to the undersigned
3
the October 1, 2009 letter from Sergeant Basalto to File, along with a statement regarding why
4
defense counsel believes that the redacted portion of that document has been withheld as
5
protected by the attorney-client privilege, for in-camera review. In all other respects plaintiffs’
6
motion to compel (Doc. No. 29) is denied without prejudice.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 18, 2011.
9
10
11
12
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\lum1807.oah111811.mtc
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
