Brown v. McDonald
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/7/2011 GRANTING 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer; DENYING 23 and 24 Motions for Extension of time as duplicative. Response to 20 Motion to Dismiss due within 60 days. (Michel, G)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
PHILLIP L. BROWN,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
vs.
MIKE McDONALD,
14
Respondent.
15
Petitioner has filed three requests for an extension of time to file a response to the
October 5, 2011 motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
18
19
1. Petitioner’s request for extension of time filed October 24, 2011 (Doc. No. 22)
is granted;
20
21
ORDER
/
16
17
No. CIV S-10-1720 LKK DAD P
2. Petitioner’s requests for an extension of time, filed on October 28, 2011 and
October 31, 2011, are denied as duplicative; and
22
3 Petitioner shall file a response to the October 5, 2011 motion to dismiss within
23
sixty days from the date of this order.
24
DATED: November 7, 2011.
25
DAD:md/4
26
brow1720.111oppo
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
