(PC) Scott v. Sanches, et al, No. 2:2010cv01664 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Scott v. Sanches, et al Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD SCOTT, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2: 10-cv-1664 WBS KJN P vs. C/P SANCHES, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed December 9, 2010, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was 17 dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. On January 19, 18 2011 and March 23, 2011 plaintiff was granted thirty day extensions of time to file his third 19 amended complaint. Thirty days from March 23, 2011, has now expired, and plaintiff has not 20 filed a third amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 2 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: May 3, 2011 6 7 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 sc1664.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
