(PC) Baker, et al v. Marsh, et al, No. 2:2010cv01586 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/22/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due w/in 14 days.(Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Baker, et al v. Marsh, et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY W. BAKER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-1586 LKK EFB P vs. MARSH, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants 14 / 15 16 On June 30, 2010, the court severed plaintiff’s claims from those of Philip Madison and 17 directed the clerk to open a new civil action as to Madison. The order further directed plaintiff 18 Baker that if he wished to proceed with this civil action he must pay the filing fee required by 28 19 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The 20 court gave plaintiff 30 days to submit the required filing fee or an application to proceed in 21 forma pauperis and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this 22 action be dismissed. 23 The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee or 24 requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 7 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 8 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: September 22, 2010. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
