Suggs et al v. 24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc. et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/4/11: This action is dismissed with prejudice, without costs. (Kaminski, H)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Kathleen Maylin (SBN 155371)
Mia N. Tucker (SBN 268389)
JACKSON LEWIS LLP
199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 394-9400
Facsimile: (415) 394-9401
E-mail: maylink@jacksonlewis.com
E-mail: Mia.Tucker@jacksonlewis.com
Attorneys for Defendant
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (erroneously sued as
“24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc.”)
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
KANDACE SUGGS, ET AL.,
13
Plaintiff(s),
14
15
16
Case No. cv-01573-JAM-DAD
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
[FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(ii)]
v.
24 HOUR FITNESS WORLDWIDE, INC.; ET
AL,
Complaint Filed: June 23, 2010
Defendant(s).
17
18
19
20
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned
attorneys for the parties that the above-captioned action should hereby be dismissed with
21
prejudice, without costs as against any party. This stipulation may be filed by any party without
22
notice.
23
24
25
26
By:
/s/
By:
John Burris
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURRIS
Attorney for Plaintiff
Kandace Suggs
/s/
Kathleen Maylin
JACKSON LEWIS LLP
Attorney for Defendant
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
27
28
1
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Case No. CV-01573-JAM-DAD
1
2
3
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE PARTIES STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IS GRANTED.
4
5
6
Dated: 11/4/2011
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Case No. CV-01573-JAM-DAD
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
