(PC) Aranda v. Meyers, et al, No. 2:2010cv01434 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/2/10: Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 18, 2010 is affirmed. Upon reconsideration, the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge filed July 6, 2010 are affirmed. Plaintiff's August 20, 2010 motion to appeal is denied 15 . Plaintiff's August 20, 2010 application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied 16 . (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Aranda v. Meyers, et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO ARANDA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-1434 GEB DAD P vs. ELIZABETH MEYERS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On August 20, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate 17 judge’s order filed June 18, 2010, denying plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis 18 and requiring him to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full for this action. Plaintiff also requests the 19 reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s July 6, 2010 findings and recommendations, which 20 recommended this action be voluntarily dismissed. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a 21 magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon 22 review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling 23 was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 18, 2010 is 3 affirmed; 4 5 2. Upon reconsideration, the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge filed July 6, 2010 are affirmed; 6 3. Plaintiff’s August 20, 2010 motion to appeal (Doc. No. 15) is denied; and 7 4. Plaintiff’s August 20, 2010 application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 8 16) is denied. 9 Dated: September 2, 2010 10 11 12 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
