(HC) Prater v. Solano County Jail, No. 2:2010cv01297 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/22/2010 ORDERING that the clerk randomly assign a US District Judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Prater v. Solano County Jail Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD WILSON PRATER, Petitioner, 11 12 No. CIV S-10-1297 EFB P vs. 13 SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, 14 Respondent. / 15 16 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Petitioner is confined in a county jail and seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 17 2254. On July 20, 2010, the court dismissed the original petition with leave to amend. The 18 dismissal order explained the petition’s deficiencies, gave petitioner 30 days to file an amended 19 petition, and warned petitioner that failure to file an amended petition could result in dismissal. 20 The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or 21 22 23 otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. 24 1 25 26 Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the order was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 7 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 8 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). In 9 his objections petitioner may address whether a certificate of appealability should issue in the 10 event he files an appeal of the judgment in this case. See Rule 11, Federal Rules Governing 11 Section 2254 Cases (the district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it 12 enters a final order adverse to the applicant). 13 Dated: September 22, 2010. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
