Edwards v. Taylor et al
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER 22 continuing date signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/17/2011. Parties shall Disclose Expert Witnesses and produce Reports no later than 6/1/2012. All Discovery shall now be completed by 8/3/2012. All Motions, except Motions for Continuance, to be submitted by 10/5/2012. Final Pretrial Conference is RE-SCHEDULED for 12/10/2012 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial is RE-SET for 2/5/2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS). (Marciel, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Jason T. Cooksey (SBN 208748)
E-mail: jcooksey@seyfarth.com
Timothy B. Nelson (SBN 235279)
E-mail: tnelson@seyfarth.com
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone: (916) 448-0159
Facsimile: (916) 558-4839
Attorneys for Defendants
RYAN TAYLOR and NIKE
RETAIL SERVICES, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
11
12
13
14
15
16
SHAUNTAE EDWARDS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.; RYAN
)
TAYLOR; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, )
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No. 2:10-CV-01250-WBS-KJN
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE
AND RELATED DATES
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES
13460964v.1
1
Based on the Plaintiff SHAUNTAE EDWARDS’ and Defendants RYAN TAYLOR’s
2
and NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.’s Stipulation to Continue Trial Date and Related Dates,
3
the Court orders that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is modified as follows:
4
5
1.
The parties shall disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than June 1, 2012.
6
2.
With regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be
7
disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on
8
or before July 2, 2012.
9
3.
All discovery, including depositions for preservation of testimony, will be left
10
open, however it shall be conducted so as to be completed by August 3, 2012. Further discovery
11
will be stayed until Plaintiff appears for her continued deposition and her deposition is
12
completed. Moreover, any discovery that has been served and is currently outstanding shall be
13
responded to pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
14
4.
Plaintiff will be reevaluated by Dr. Joy Policar, or another health care
15
professional, in December 2011, to determine whether she is capable of appearing for her
16
continued deposition. Plaintiff’s counsel will immediately notify Defendants’ counsel following
17
her consultation in December 2011 whether Plaintiff is capable of appearing for her continued
18
deposition. If a health care professional deems that Plaintiff is not capable of appearing for her
19
deposition in December 2011, Plaintiff will be reevaluated by a health care professional on a
20
monthly basis to determine when she will capable of appearing for her continued deposition.
21
5.
All motions, except motions for continuance, temporary restraining order, or other
22
emergency applications, shall be filed on or before October 5, 2012.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES
13460964v.1
1
2
6.
The Final Pretrial Conference will be held at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 on
December 10, 2012.
3
7.
The jury trial will begin at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5 on February 5, 2013.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 17, 2011
7
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted by,
11
Jason T. Cooksey (SBN 208748)
E-mail: jcooksey@seyfarth.com
Timothy B. Nelson (SBN 235279)
E-mail: tnelson@seyfarth.com
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone: (916) 448-0159
Facsimile: (916) 558-4839
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
s/ Timothy B. Nelson
Timothy B. Nelson
Attorney for Defendants RYAN TAYLOR
and NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES
13460964v.1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
