United States of America v. Real Property located at 12711 Highway 89, Sierraville, California, Sierra County

Filing 5

RELATED CASE ORDER 3 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/18/2010. Examination of actions reveals that 2:09-CR-0513 MCE is RELATED because they involve the same parties, are based on the same or similar claim, and involve the same property transaction or event. Because both case are already assigned to Judge England, this Order is issued for informational purposes ONLY and shall not effect status of matters. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12711 HIGHWAY 89, SIERRAVILLE, CALIFORNIA, SIERRA COUNTY, APN: 018-0500360 (FORMERLY APNs: 018-050003, 018-050-001 AND 018-050002), INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, Defendant. ____________________________/ Defendants. ____________________________/ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-01116-MCE-KJM v. DALE RICHARD FRISBEY, THOMAS GLENN COOPMAN, EDWIN BLODEN TOOLE, MONTGOMERY MEIGS ATWATER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, RELATED CASE ORDER No. 2:09-cr-00513-MCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court received the Notice of Related Cases filed May 6, 2010. Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that both actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), E.D. Cal. (1997). The actions involve the same parties, are based on the same or a similar claim, and involve the same property transaction or event. Because the cases are already assigned to the same district judge, this Order is issued for informational purposes only and shall have no effect on the status of the cases. Dated: May 18, 2010 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?