Alfaro v. Bank of America
Filing
7
ORDER denying 4 Motion to set a court date signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/19/10. (Kaminski, H)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. BANK OF AMERICA Defendant. / Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff filed a document on April 26, 2010, that requests "a motion to set a court date" in her civil case. (Dkt. No. 4.) This document did not specify the court date sought and did not specify the relief plaintiff seeks. If plaintiff desires to file a motion on a particular issue, she may contact the undersigned's courtroom deputy clerk to set that matter on the court's calendar. Plaintiff is cautioned, however, that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Eastern District of California's Local Rules, a request for a court order must, among other things, be made by motion which shall (1) state with particularity the grounds for seeking the court order and //// //// //// 1 ORDER MIKA ALFARO, Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-00891 JAM KJN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
(2) state the relief sought. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 7(b).1 Additionally, plaintiff must comply with those rules' procedural requirements. See e.g., Local Rule 230(b) ("The moving party shall file a notice of motion, motion, accompanying briefs, affidavits, if appropriate, and copies of all documentary evidence that the moving party intends to submit in support of the motion.") For the foregoing reasons, this motion is DENIED. DATED: May 19, 2010
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The court also notes that plaintiff has not yet served defendant with her complaint, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, although the time for such service has not yet expired. 2
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
