(HC)Ramos v. Ives, No. 2:2010cv00871 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/01/10 vacating 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This action is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is directed to close this case. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(HC)Ramos v. Ives Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNESTO RAMOS, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-0871 DAD P vs. RICHARD B. IVES, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On April 22, 2010, the undersigned issued findings and 18 recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed as duplicative. On May 27, 2010, 19 this case was reassigned to the undersigned magistrate judge for all further proceedings.1 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. The court’s April 22, 2010 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 4) are 22 vacated; 23 ///// 24 25 26 1 Petitioner filed his consent to proceed before a magistrate judge on April 22, 2010. (Doc. No. 5.) Respondent similarly filed his consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction on May 21, 2010. (Doc. No. 7.) 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and 2 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 3 DATED: June 1, 2010. 4 5 6 7 DAD:sj ramo0871.123(2) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.