Garcia v. City of Sacramento et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/11 RESETTING MOTION HEARING as to #27 Motion for Protective Order : Motion Hearing reset for 12/8/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Manzer, C) Modified on 11/23/2011 (Manzer, C).
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
Stewart Katz, SBN # 127425
Guy Danilowitz, SBN # 257733
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95825
(916) 444-5678
Attorneys for Plaintiff
James Garcia
6
7
8
9
10
11
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
EILEEN M. TEICHERT, City Attorney (SBN 167027)
SHERI M. CHAPMAN, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 215775)
P.O. Box 1948, Sacramento, CA 95812-1948
915 I Street, 4th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 808-5346
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
JAMES GARCIA,
Plaintiff,
16
17
NO. 2:10-CV-00826 JAM KJN
vs.
21
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; City of
Sacramento Chief of Police RICHARD
BRAZIEL (Badge #5030); City of
Sacramento Police Officer GARY DAHL
(Badge #0672); and DOES I through XX,
inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
_________________________________/
18
19
20
24
25
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
December 1, 2011
10:00 a.m.
25
The Hon. Kendall J. Newman
COME NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective parties and subject to
the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue
26
the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel Defendants City of Sacramento and Gary Dahl
27
and Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order from December 1, 2011 to December 8, 2011
28
at 10:00 a.m.
Garcia –Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing
1
1
2
This continuance is requested because the parties require additional time to meet and
confer and to prepare the joint statement re discovery dispute.
3
4
Dated: November 22, 2011
LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
5
/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ,
Attorney for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
Dated: November 22, 2011
EILEEN M. TEICHERT
City Attorney
10
/s/ Sheri Chapman
SHERI M. CHAPMAN
Senior Deputy City Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, RICHARD
BRAZIEL and GARY DAHL
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
The parties’ stipulation (Dkt. No. 31) is HEREBY APPROVED. Accordingly,
19
the December 1, 2011 hearing on plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery responses (Dkt.
20
Nos. 23-24), and defendants’ motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 27) is continued to
21
December 8, 2011.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 22, 2011
24
25
26
27
28
Garcia –Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
