Johnson v. Secret River Inc., et al
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/4/2010 GRANTING plaintiff's 5 Request. Defendants Prestige Management and Secret River, Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). (Marciel, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 10-cv-00792-JAM-EFB PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF SECRET RIVER, INC.; PRESTIGE MANAGEMENT, AND ORDER
Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff, vs.
Secret River, Inc., et al, Complaint Filed: FEBRUARY 28, 2010 Defendants CASE TO REMAIN OPEN WITH REMAINING DEFENDANTS
IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendants (Secret River, Inc.; Prestige Management) be and are hereby dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to remain open with remaining Defendants.
Defendants (Secret River, Inc.; Prestige Management) are dismissed because these Defendants are not proper parties to this action. Dated: May 4, 2010 /s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff
1 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-10-00792-JAM-EFB
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez______________ U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
2 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-10-00792-JAM-EFB
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
