Turner v. Prieto et al
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/25/10 ORDERING that within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the 4/8/10 order; and failure to respond to this order will result in dismissalof this action. (Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ED G. PRIETO, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. See Dkt. No. 4. By an order filed April 8, 2010 plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit within thirty days. See Dkt. No. 5. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. //// //// //// //// //// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER, Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-0756 KJN P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
turn0756.fifp
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the April 8, 2010 order; and failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action. DATED: May 25, 2010
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
