Okwu v. California Department of Transportation
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/6/2010 ORDERING 11 that Defendant shall file its responsive pleading to plaintiff's complaint by 5/10/2010. (Reader, L)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RONALD W. BEALS, Chief Counsel THOMAS C. FELLENZ, Deputy Chief Counsel CRISTIANA I. ROJAS, Assistant Chief Counsel NAVTEJ BASSI (SBN 188406) 1120 N Street, P.O. Box 1438 (MS 57) Sacramento, California 95812-1438 Telephone: (916) 654-2630 Facsimile: (916) 654-6128 Representatives for Defendant State of California, Department of Transportation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: SACRAMENTO DIVISION
JOSEPHINE OKWU, Plaintiff,
vs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 2:10-CV-00653-GEB-KJM
AMENDED STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 144(a)
1 AMENDED STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSIVE PLEADING
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The parties hereby stipulate that the date for Defendant DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff OKWU's complaint be extended to May 10, 2010. Such an extension by stipulation up to 28 days is permissible under the Eastern District's Local Rule 144(a) without the Court's approval.
ORDER The court, having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing thereto, IT IS ORDERED that DEFENDANT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION shall file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint by May 10, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 05/06/10
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
2 AMENDED STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSIVE PLEADING
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
