(PS) Smith v. United States of America, et al, No. 2:2010cv00624 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/6/2010 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Objections due within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
(PS) Smith v. United States of America, et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE SMITH, SR., Plaintiff, 11 12 CIV S-10-624 FCD KJM PS vs. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 14 Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 15 16 By order filed April 2, 2010, this court directed plaintiff within twenty-one days 17 to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee.1 Plaintiff has 18 failed to comply with the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 19 20 without prejudice. See Local Rule 110. These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 21 22 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 23 fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 24 1 25 26 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(d), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 2 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 3 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 4 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: May 6, 2010. 6 006 7 smith-usa.ftc-nca 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.