-DAD (PS) Watkins v. Pope et al, No. 2:2010cv00620 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/19/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-DAD (PS) Watkins v. Pope et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT LOUIS WATKINS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0620 LKK DAD PS vs. JAMIE POPE, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed August 8, 2011, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with 17 leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff was granted thirty days from the date of the 18 order to file a second amended complaint and was cautioned that failure to respond to the court’s 19 order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 20 thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 24 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 25 fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 26 written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal 3 the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: September 19, 2011. 5 6 7 8 DAD:kw Ddad1\orders.pro se\watkins0620.fta 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
