(HC) Harrison v. CDCR, et al.,, No. 2:2010cv00547 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/7/10 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form for a civil rights action by a prisoner; RECOMMENDING that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Harrison v. CDCR, et al., Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL F. HARRISON, Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 No. CIV-S-10-0547 FCD KJM P vs. DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Respondents. 15 ORDER AND / 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of 17 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma 19 pauperis. 20 Examination of the request to proceed in forma pauperis reveals petitioner is 21 unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is 22 granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 23 An application for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 can only be 24 considered if the habeas petitioner alleges he is in custody in violation of the United States 25 Constitution. Petitioner makes no such allegation in his petition. Rather, he challenges his 26 conditions of confinement, specifically, his ability to access courts under the First Amendment. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Allegations of unconstitutional conditions of confinement generally must be brought in an action 2 filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For these reasons, petitioner’s habeas petition should be dismissed. Petitioner 3 4 may bring a different action under § 1983 to challenge the matters asserted in his petition. He is 5 advised that he will be required to pay the $350 filing fee, for a § 1983 action, in installments at 6 least. 7 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Petitioner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and 9 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form for a civil rights 10 11 12 action by a prisoner. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. 13 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 14 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 15 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 16 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 17 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 18 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 19 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 20 DATED: May 7, 2010. 21 22 23 1 harr0547.114(3.8.10) 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
