(PS) Harris v. Homeq Servicing, No. 2:2010cv00483 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 6/3/10, ORDERING that the 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are VACATED. Pltf's 12 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED. Pltf shall file an opposition on or before 6/24/10. Dft's reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter. Dft's motion to dismiss shall be heard on July 8, 2010 in courtroom 26 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Harris v. Homeq Servicing Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY K. HARRIS, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV 2:10cv0483-JAM-JFM (PS) HOMEQ SERVICING, Defendant. 14 ORDER / 15 On March 16, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which was scheduled to 16 17 be heard on April 29, 2010. On April 27, 2010, the hearing was continued to June 3, 2010 18 because of plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition. On May 25, 2010, this court issued findings 19 and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed because plaintiff again failed 20 to file an opposition. On May 26, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file 21 22 an opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff represents that he is in the process of 23 obtaining counsel. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The May 25, 2010 findings and recommendations are vacated; 25 2. Plaintiff’s May 26, 2010 motion is granted; 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3. Plaintiff shall file an opposition on or before June 24, 2010. Defendant’s reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter; and 3 4. Defendant’s motion to dismiss shall be heard on July 8, 2010 in courtroom 26 4 at 11:00 a.m. before the undersigned. 5 DATED: June 3, 2010. 6 7 8 9 /014.harr0483.36 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.