(HC) Wilson v. The People Of The State Of California, No. 2:2010cv00433 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 04/27/10; the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D) Modified on 4/28/2010 (Manzer, C).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Wilson v. The People Of The State Of California Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY WILSON, 11 12 13 Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-0433 FCD EFB P vs. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 14 Respondent. 16 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 10, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 10, 2010, are adopted in full; 3 2. This action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; and 4 3. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 5 DATED: April 27, 2010. 6 7 8 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
