Kirk v. Richards
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/17/11 granting 52 Motion to conduct plaintiff's deposition by videoconference. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
(916) 456-1122
(916) 737-1126 (fax)
Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021
Matthew Ross Wilson, CSB #236309
5
6
Attorneys for defendant
RICHARDS
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
LARRY W. KIRK,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
T. RICHARDS,
Defendants.
15
CASE NO: 2:10-CV-00373-GEB-CKD P
ORDER
16
ORDER
17
Defendant RICHARDS seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule
18
19
of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants’ counsel to conduct the deposition of
20
plaintiff LARRY W. KIRK via videoconference so as to avoid the unnecessary expense
21
of traveling approximately 200 miles from Sacramento to the plaintiff’s place of
22
incarceration in Soledad, California.
23
Having read the defendant’s request, and good cause appearing,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
25
1.
Defendant’s request to conduct plaintiff’s deposition via
26
videoconference is GRANTED.
27
///
28
///
Kirk v Richards [2:10-cv-0373] Order Regarding Videoconference Deposition of Plaintiff
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
2.
Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution
to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
Dated: November 17, 2011
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Kirk v Richards [2:10-cv-0373] Order Regarding Videoconference Deposition of Plaintiff
Page 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
