(PC) Stanley v. Kapata et al, No. 2:2010cv00276 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/1/10 ORDERING that Clerk shall assign a district judge to this action; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for plaintiff'sfailure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Stanley v. Kapata et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH STANLEY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-10-0276 GGH P KAPATA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by 17 the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which 18 requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 19 20 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and 11-110. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: March 1, 2010 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 stan276.33a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
