Kaur et al v. Mayorkas
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 5/26/10 ORDERING dfts' answer is due on 7/2/10. (Carlos, K)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2729 Attorneys for Defendants
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PARAMJIT KAUR, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ) Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al. ) ) ) Defendants. ) No. 2:10-cv-262 FCD KJM JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs have challenged the delay in adjudication of their applications for an I-130 visa and to adjust status to that of lawful permanent resident by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. The parties have previously stipulated to one extension of time, until June 2, 2010. The parties advise that they continue to endeavor to reach a resolution to the matter at the administrative level. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to a second extension of time for the filing of the government's answer, until July 2, 2010.
Dated: May 25, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/Audrey Hemesath Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants
-1-
1 2 3 4 5
By:
/s/ Jonathan M. Kaufman Jonathan M. Kaufman Attorney for the Plaintiffs
ORDER 6 Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY 7 ORDERED that the defendants' Answer is due on July 2, 2010. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DATED: May 26, 2010 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
_______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
