(PC) Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group et al, No. 2:2010cv00247 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/23/2010 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations in full. All dfts but Kadevari are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN SCOTT SEEFELDT, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-0247 LKK GGH P vs. CA. FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 17, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 17, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. All defendants but Kadevari are dismissed from this action without prejudice. 4 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 5 DATED: September 23, 2010. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
