-EFB (TEMP)(PC)Rodriguez v. City of Stockton et al, No. 2:2010cv00204 - Document 35 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/3/11 ORDERING that Defendants' 1/11/11 Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED in that the Court judicially notices that charges presented in San Joaquin County Case Number SF112865 A have b een resolved by a jury. The FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS issued 12/20/10 31 are VACATED. Defendants' 8/20/10 MOTION to Dismiss 17 is DENIED as MOOT; and Defendants' Responsive pleading is due within twenty-one days. Defendants should refer to the Court's 5/4/10 screening order for identification of remaining defendant and claims. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
-EFB (TEMP)(PC)Rodriguez v. City of Stockton et al Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN R. RODRIGUEZ, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. CIV S-10-0204 GEB EFB (TEMP) P Plaintiff is a San Joaquin County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 20, 2010, defendants moved to dismiss because there are 18 state criminal charges pending related to issues arising in this case. On December 20, 2010, the 19 court recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied, but that this action be stayed pending 20 the outcome of the criminal charges. 21 Defendants have now filed a request for judicial notice. The court construes this as a 22 request that the court take judicial notice under Rule 201(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence 23 that the criminal charges have been resolved by a jury trial. The court takes judicial notice of 24 that fact, vacates the December 20, 2010 findings and recommendations, denies 25 defendants’ August 20, 2010 motion to dismiss as moot and orders defendants to file their 26 responsive pleading with twenty-one days. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Defendants’ January 11, 2011 request for judicial notice is granted in that the court 3 judicially notices that charges presented in San Joaquin County Case number SF112865 A have 4 been resolved by a jury; 5 2. The findings and recommendations issued December 20, 2010 are vacated; 6 3. Defendants’ August 20, 2010 motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 17, is denied as moot; and 7 4. Defendants’ responsive pleading is due within twenty-one days. Defendants should 8 refer to the court’s May 4, 2010 screening order for identification of remaining defendants and 9 claims. 10 DATED: February 3, 2011. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.