-EFB (PC) Jamison v. Davis Enterprise Newspaper et al, No. 2:2010cv00124 - Document 128 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 84 and 107 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/2/2011 DENYING 60 , 73 and 86 Motions for Injunctive Relief. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
-EFB (PC) Jamison v. Davis Enterprise Newspaper et al Doc. 128 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY JAMISON aka DWAYNE GARRETT, 11 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0124 KJM EFB P 12 vs. 13 BAILEY, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner who is now represented by counsel, has filed this civil 17 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The instant 19 motions seek injunctive relief. 20 On March 9 and June 21, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and 21 recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that 22 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from 23 the date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 24 March 9, 2011 findings and recommendations. 25 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 the court finds both sets of findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 2 the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9 and June 21, 2011, are 5 adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s December 22, 2010 motion for injunctive relief is denied. See ECF 6 7 No. 73; 3. Plaintiff’s December 3, 2010 motion for injunctive relief is denied. See ECF 8 9 No. 60; and 4. Plaintiff’s March 10, 2011 motion for injunctive relief is denied. See ECF No. 10 11 86. 12 DATED: August 2, 2011. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.