-KJN (PS) Edwards v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC, No. 2:2010cv00092 - Document 46 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 45 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/6/11: The motion to dismiss plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is granted 30 . Defendant's requests for judicial notice is granted. Defendant's motion to expunge the lis pendens is granted 32 . Defendant's request for attorneys' fees is denied 32 . The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and vacate all future dates.(Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-KJN (PS) Edwards v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHIEU EDWARDS, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV-S-10-0092-LKK-KJN-PS AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-50, 14 15 Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER 16 On May 2, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 17 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 20 21 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 45) filed May 2, 2011, are 3 4 5 6 7 ADOPTED; 2. The motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 30) plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 29) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is granted; 3. All claims alleged in plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 29) as against defendant Aurora Loan Services, LLC (“Aurora”) are dismissed with prejudice; 8 4. Defendant’s requests for judicial notice (Dkt. Nos. 30-2, 32-3) is granted; 9 5. Defendant’s motion to expunge the lis pendens (Dkt. No. 32-1) is granted, and the 10 notice of pendency of action recorded by plaintiff on October 30, 2009, in the official records of 11 the County of San Joaquin Recorder’s Office as Instrument Number 2009-158423 is expunged; 12 13 6. Defendant’s request for attorneys’ fees (Dkt. No. 32-1 at 12) pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 405.38 is denied; and 14 7. Because all claims against defendant Aurora are dismissed, and because Aurora is the 15 only named defendant in this case, plaintiff’s action is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of 16 Court is directed to close this case and vacate all future dates in this case. 17 DATED: July 6, 2011. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
