United States of America et al v. Shadley

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/11/10 ORDERING that respondent Linda P. Shadley shall appear at the Office of Internal Revenue Officer Charles Duff on 6/3/10, at 9:00 a.m. and comply with the Internal Revenue Service Summons issued on 4/29/09. The Petition requesting that respondent be held in contempt is dropped without prejudice, subject to its being renewed if respondent does not comply fully with this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ----oo0oo---This matter came on regularly for hearing on May 10, 2010, for hearing on this courts Order to Show Cause why respondent ought not be adjudged in civil contempt. 17.) (Docket No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CHARLES DUFF, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service, Petitioners, v. LINDA P. SHADLEY, Respondent. / NO. 2:09-MC-00080 WBS GGH ORDER Petitioners were represented by Assistant U. S. Attorney Yoshinori H. T. Himel; respondent Linda P. Shadley appeared in propria persona. Respondent indicated her willingness to fully comply with the Summons after being afforded an opportunity to gather tax documents and consult with an attorney. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent Linda P. Shadley shall appear at the office of Internal Revenue Officer Charles Duff on June 3, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. and comply with the Internal Revenue Service Summons issued on April 29, 2009. The petition requesting that respondent be held in contempt is hereby dropped without prejudice, subject to its being renewed if respondent does not comply fully with this order. DATED: May 11, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?