(PC)Rasheed v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al, No. 2:2009cv03560 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/07/10 vacating 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within 30 days of the date of this order or this action will be dismissed without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Rasheed v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAHEE ABD’RASHEED, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3560 FCD DAD P vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 17 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 28, 2010, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations, 18 recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to file a properly completed 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis. On May 19, 2010, plaintiff filed objections to the April 20 28, 2010 findings and recommendations, arguing therein that he has attempted to obtain a trust 21 account statement from prison staff but has been denied on numerous occasions. Accordingly, 22 plaintiff requests that the court reconsider its April 28, 2010 findings and recommendations and 23 order prison staff to cooperate with his requests for trust account information. 24 Plaintiff’s inability to obtain trust account information for the purpose of filing an 25 in forma pauperis application in this civil rights action may be explained by his status as a “three 26 strikes” litigant. The federal in forma pauperis statute includes a limitation on the number of 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 actions in which a prisoner can proceed in forma pauperis. Known as the “three strikes” rule, 28 2 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides: 3 In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under [§ 1915] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 4 5 6 7 8 The court has reviewed its own records and has determined that plaintiff has had three or more 9 actions dismissed as frivolous, as malicious, or as failing to state a claim upon which relief may 10 be granted.1 Specifically, in Rasheed v. Harrington, No. 1:09-cv-1490-AWI-DLB PC, Chief U.S. 11 District Judge Anthony Ishii of this court found that plaintiff suffered at least the following three 12 strikes under § 1915(g): Smith v. Holm, No. 3:06-cv-5992-SI; Smith v. Scribner, No. 1:07-cv- 13 0509-LJO-SMS; and Smith v. Social Sec. Admin. Office, Employees, No. 1:07-cv-0531-AWI- 14 SMS. (See Doc. No. 3.) Therefore, plaintiff is precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis 15 unless he can demonstrate that he is under imminent danger of serious physical harm. See 28 16 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 17 After a careful review of plaintiff’s complaint, the court finds that plaintiff is not 18 under imminent danger of serious physical harm. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that he is 19 being denied access to his trust account and to his business and legal mail. Plaintiff does not 20 suggest that he is in any danger of being physically harmed. Thus, plaintiff may only proceed 21 with this action if he pays the $350.00 filing fee in full. See Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 22 1120 (9th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the court will grant plaintiff a final thirty days leave to pay 23 the $350.00 filing fee. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to pay the filing fee in full will result in 24 the dismissal of this action. 25 1 26 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9 th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980). 2 1 For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The court’s April 28, 2010 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 9) are 3 vacated; and 4 2. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty days of the date of 5 this order or this action will be dismissed without prejudice. 6 DATED: June 7, 2010. 7 8 9 10 DAD:sj rash3560.vac+3B 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
