-KJN (PS) Bank of America, N.A. v. Alizadeh et al, No. 2:2009cv03557 - Document 49 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/30/11 ORDERING that the proposed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 4/28/11 48 are ADOPTED; Defendants' MOTIONS to SET ASIDE the entry of Default 43 , 44 are GRANTED. The Clerk's Certificate of Entry of Default 9 is SET ASIDE; and Plaintiff's MOTION for Default 11 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
-KJN (PS) Bank of America, N.A. v. Alizadeh et al Doc. 49 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HQ4, a national banking company, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 No. 2:09-cv-03557 JAM KJN PS v. ABOLGHASSEM ALIZADEH, an individual, KOBRA ALIZADEH, an individual, 18 Defendants. ORDER / 19 20 On April 28, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 23 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 24 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 1983). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 4 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 28, 2011, are ADOPTED; 5 2. Defendants’ motions to set aside the entry of default (Dkt. Nos. 43, 44) are granted; 6 3. The Clerk’s Certificate of Entry of Default (Dkt. No. 9) is set aside; and 7 4. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 11) is denied. 8 DATED: June 30, 2011 9 /s/ John A. Mendez 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.