(PC) Bardo v. Martel et al, No. 2:2009cv03479 - Document 33 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 5/2/2011 ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations in full. Pltf's 24 Motion for TRO is DENIED as moot. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Bardo v. Martel et al Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT J. BARDO, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 8, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 8, 2011, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s February 15, 2011 request for a temporary restraining order is 4 denied as moot. 5 DATED: May 2, 2011. 6 7 8 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
