(PC) Hollis v. Downing, et al, No. 2:2009cv03431 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/4/10 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 2/3/10, are adopted in full; and Plaintiff's claims against defendants Rainey, Keating, Foulk, and Bolls alleging that his First Amendment rights were violated with regard to his proceeding in Case No. CIV-S-09-1065 FCD KJM P and Case No. CIV-S-08-1094 MCE KJM P are dismissed without leave to amend and defendants Foulk and Bolls are dismissed from this action. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Hollis v. Downing, et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. M. S. DOWNING, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. 2:09-cv-3431 FCD KJN P Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On February 3, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 3, 2010, are adopted in full; 3 4 and 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Rainey, Keating, Foulk, and Bolls 5 alleging that his First Amendment rights were violated with regard to his proceeding in Case No. 6 CIV-S-09-1065 FCD KJM P and Case No. CIV-S-08-1094 MCE KJM P are dismissed without 7 leave to amend and that defendants Foulk and Bolls are dismissed from this action. 8 DATED: March 4, 2010. 9 10 11 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.