(PS) Andre-Gollihar v. County of San Joaquin, et al, No. 2:2009cv03313 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/11/10 ORDERING that the Proposed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 4/6/10 6 are ADOPTED; and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants State of California and the California State Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and they are DISMISSED from this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PS) Andre-Gollihar v. County of San Joaquin, et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRA ANDRE-GOLLIHAR, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV-S-09-3313-MCE-KJN-PS vs. 13 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., 14 Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER 15 16 On April 6, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 17 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 18 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 19 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 6, 2010, are ADOPTED; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice as to defendants State of California and 4 the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and they are dismissed from this 5 action. 6 Dated: May 11, 2010 7 8 9 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.