Peralta v. Martel et al
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/6/11 ORDERING that defendants file an answer to the complaint within 28 days.(Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
CION PERALTA,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL MARTEL, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
No. CIV S-09-3228 FCD GGH P
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
16
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis statutes was revoked on
17
February 24, 2011, and plaintiff then paid the filing fee on March 31, 2011. On April 20, 2011,
18
the court ordered plaintiff to address the inconsistencies between his original in forma pauperis
19
application and his current ability to pay the filing fee. Plaintiff has offered an explanation that
20
the court accepts, but the court will be mindful of plaintiff’s ability to pay should he file any
21
cases in the future.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants file an answer to the
23
complaint within twenty-eight days.
24
DATED: June 6, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
ggh: ab - pera3228.ord2
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
